About Us
Governance
Programs
Activities
Forums
Links and Affiliates
Email

Search for

IPER
THE WEB

Search Engine
Powered by SiteLevel

 

The Shift to Parliamentary System: Changing the terrain for PO/NGO Intervention
By Mr. Earl G. Parreño
Member, IPER Board of Trustees

pages 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 


4. The stability of the government should also be considered. A very weak government, prone to constant change, will get the agenda of the POs/NGOs nowhere. In this regard, it is recommended that a President shall be vested with enough powers to enable him to act as an effective arbiter in state affairs. To add credibility to the Presidency in his role as arbiter, he shall be popularly elected, with no chance of reelection.

5. The executive power shall be vested in a Prime Minister and ministers elected from among the members of the parliament. Safeguards to prevent frequent elections can be instituted like the experience of France.

6. The development of a multiparty system also favors the POs/NGOs. It will give more opportunity to smaller parties in the formation of coalition governments. In this regard, we should push for the legislation of measures that will encourage parties to participate in elections, such as, subsidies in campaign expenses and access to the media.

The constitution should also discourage turncoatism and raiding of parties to ensure the healthy development of political parties. Provisions such as the forfeiture of seat if an individual switches party can be instituted.

7. A system of recall can be instituted, on the initiative of a party or of the constituency concerned. The bases of this is obvious.

8. There are only two procedures constitutionally available for the revision of the Charter. One is to convene the present Congress into a constituent assembly to revise the constitution. The second is to call for a Constitutional Convention for the same purpose. The exercise of the power of initiative and referendum can only be used to amend the constitution. However, the proposal to shift to the parliamentary system needs a revision, not mere amendment, to the constitution.

Between a constitutional convention and the convening of Congress into a constituent assembly, the former is more favorable to the POs/NGOs. They can have greater chances to send delegates to the convention for a more direct hand in the framing.

However, if the Senate will be persuaded by the House to convene as a constituent assembly, the POs/NGOs should be active in influencing the assembly to adopt their proposals.

pages 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 
 



© 2003 IPER.ORG.PH
This site is best viewed on IE 6.0 | 800x600 | Java-script Enabled
Institute For Electoral and Political Reform
262 15th Avenue, Cubao, Quezon City, Philippines 1102
FAX: (632)912-4005 | Tel: (632)913-4207

Contact Webmaster